The Importance of Investigating Elaborative Interrogation Tasks for the Facilitation of Discourse Comprehension: Gaps in Current Research & Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55414/ap.v41i1.957Keywords:
Elaborative interrogation tasks, Discourse comprehension, Expository discourse, Narrative discourseAbstract
Discourse comprehension is key for social participation and student learning. Prior studies suggest that performing elaboration tasks promotes that readers engage with the text, and process it more deeply. Among them, interrogative elaboration tasks (such as ‘Why do you think the sentence you just read is accurate?’) have a central role. Considering the importance of facilitating text comprehension for student learning, the goal of this narrative review is to present studies that have examined the role of these tasks. With this aim, we will present an overview of the processes involved in discourse comprehension. Then, we will present studies that have examined the role of these tasks in the comprehension of expository and narrative discourse by students of different ages who speak different languages, in order to highlight contributions and gaps in current research, and propose new questions that can promote new studies. Among them, we will highlight that prior studies have not tended to examine the interplay between the presentation of elaborative questions and the modality of presentation of the material, or to present spontaneous discourse materials, or materiales about current social issues. We will also present applications to Education, which can provide tools to educators. We expect that this review will contribute to highlighting the need that future studies examine topics that contribute to the promotion of the comprehension of discourse that students process in academic settings, during their social participation in everyday life and that focus on socially relevant topics.
Downloads
References
Acosta Buralli, K. y Cevasco, J. (2021). El rol de la conectividad causal, la toma de notas y la modalidad de presentación del material en la comprensión de materiales sobre ESI (Educación Sexual Integral). Poster presentado en el XIII Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología (23-25 de noviembre). Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Asiala, L.K., Chan, G.C., Kurby, C.A. y Magliano, J.P. (2020). The role of goals and goal barriers in predicting the outcomes of intentional actions in the contexts of narrative text. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 82-92 [DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2019.1690494].
Beker, K., Jolles, D. y van den Broek, P.W. (2017). Chapter 2. Meaningful learning from texts. The construction of knowledge representations. En J.A. León e I. Escudero (Eds.), Reading Comprehension in Educational Settings (pp. 29-62) (Book series: Studies in written language and literacy, 16). John Benjamins Publishing Company [DOI: 10.1075/swll.16.02bek].
Bertrams, A., Baumeister, R.F., Englert, C. y and Furley, P. (2015). Ego depletion in color priming research: self-control strength moderates the detrimental effect of red on cognitive test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 311-322 [DOI: 10.1177/0146167214564968].
Bohn-Gettler, C.M. y Rapp, D.N. (2011). Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 562-577 [DOI: 10.1037/a0023458].
Bohn-Gettler, C.M., Johnson, E.J., Maslowski, A., Swanson, L., Thoreson, K. y Womeldorf, S. (2017). The “chemistry” of learning: Interacting effects of emotions, goals, and text cohesion. Poster presentado en el
th Annual Meeting of The Society for Text and Discourse (Filadelfia, 31 de julio- 2 de agosto).
Bohn-Gettler, C.M., Marzolf, B.A. y Heisler, J.D. (2016). Taking pride or feeling shame: The effects of emotions on inferences. Poster presentado en el 26th Annual Meeting of The Society for Text and Discourse (Kassel, 18-20 de julio).
Callender, A.A. y McDaniel, M.A. (2007). The benefits of embedded question adjuncts for low and high structure builders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 339-348 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.339].
Cevasco, J. (2009). The Role of Connectives in the Comprehension of Spontaneous Spoken Discourse. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 56-65 [DOI: 10.1017/S1138741600001475].
Cevasco, J., Muller, F. y Bermejo, F. (2017). Facilitation of the Comprehension of Written and Spoken Discourse. Psychology and Education Journal, 54(monograph 2).
Cevasco, J., Muller, F. y Bermejo, F. (2020). Comprehension of topic shifts by Argentinean college students: Role of discourse marker presence, causal connectivity and prior knowledge. Current Psychology, 39(5-6-), 1072-1085 [DOI: 10.1007/S12144-018-9828-4].
Cevasco, J. y van den Broek, P. (2008). The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Psicothema, 20(4), 801-806.
Cevasco, J. y van den Broek, P. (2016). The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse. Cognitive Processing, 17(2), 185-194 [DOI: 10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8].
Cevasco, J. y van den Broek, P. (2017). The importance of causality processing in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Ciencia Cognitiva, 11(2), 40-42.
Cevasco, J. y van den Broek, P. (2019). Contributions of Causality Processing Models to the Study of Discourse Comprehension and the Facilitation of Student Learning. Psicología Educativa, 25(2), 159-167 [DOI: 10.5093/psed2019a8].
Chronaki, G., Wigelsworth, M., Pell, M.D. y Kotz, S.A. (2018). The development of crosscultural recognition of vocal emotion during childhood and adolescence. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 8659 [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26889].
Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M.L., Carlson, S.E. y Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading & Writing, 33(5-6), 2223-2248 [DOI: 10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2].
Cossavella, F. y Cevasco, J. (2021). The importance of studying the role of filled pauses in the construction of a coherent representation of spontaneous spoken discourse. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 172-186 [DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2021.1893325].
Craik, F.I.M. y Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268-294 [DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268].
de Bruïne, A. de, Jolles, D. y van den Broek, P. (2021). Minding the load or loading the mind: The effect of manipulating working memory on coherence monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, 104212 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104212].
de Simone, J. y Cevasco, J. (2021). The Role of the Establishment of Causal Connections and the Modality of Presentation of Discourse in the Generation of Emotion Inferences by Argentine College Students, Reading Psychology, 42(1) 22-41 [DOI: 10. 1080/02702711.2020.1837314].
Di Leo, I., Muis, K.R., Singh, C.A. y Psaradellis, C. (2019). Curiosity... Confusion? Frustration! The role and sequencing of emotions during mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 121-137 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.001].
Dornisch, M.M. y Sperling, R.A. (2006). Facilitating Learning From Technology-Enhanced Text: Effects of Prompted Elaborative Interrogation. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 156-166 [DOI: 10.3200/JOER.99.3.156-166].
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J. y Willingham, D.T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4-58 [DOI: 10.1177/1529100612453266].
Endres, T., Carpenter, S., Martin, A. y Renkl, A. (2017). Enhancing learning by retrieval: Enriching free recall with elaborative prompting. Learning and Instruction, 49, 13-20 [DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.010].
Espin, C.A., Cevasco, J., van den Broek, P., Baker, S. y Gersten, R. (2007). History as Narrative: The Nature and Quality of Historical Understanding for Students With Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(2), 174-182 [DOI: 10.1177/00222194070400020801].
Farooq, O. (2019). The Effect of Elaborative Interrogation on the Synthesis of Ideas from Multiple Sources of Information. Open Information Science, 3(1), 76-87 [DOI: 10.1515/opis-2019-0006].
Ferreira, F. y Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language processing? En M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fichman, S., Armon-Lotem, S., Walters, J. y Altman, C. (2021) Story Grammar Elements and Mental State Terms in the Expression of Enabling Relations in Narratives of Bilingual Preschool Children. Discourse Processes, 58(10), 925-942 [DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1972391].
Fiorella, L. y Mayer, R.E. (2016). Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717-741 [DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9].
Fox Tree, J.E. y Clark, N.B. (2013). Communicative Effectiveness of Written Versus Spoken Feedback. Discourse Processes, 50(5), 339-359.
Fraundorf, S.H. y Watson, D.G. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 161-175 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004].
Fraundorf, S.H. y Watson, D.G. (2014). Alice's adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(9), 1083-1096 [DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.832785].
Golding, J.M., Millis, K.K., Hauselt, J. y Sego, S.A. (1995). The effect of connectives and causal relatedness on text comprehension. En R.F. Lorch y E.J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 127-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
González García, J. (2007). El proceso de lectura conjunta de cuentos infantiles. Estudio comparado en España y México. Apuntes de Psicología, 25(2), 129-144.
Gygax, P. y Gillioz, C. (2015). Chapter 6. Emotion inferences during reading: going beyond the tip of the iceberg. En E.J. O’Brien, A.E. Cook y R.F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during Reading (pp. 122-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [DOI: 10.1017/9781107279186.007].
Helder, A., Van Leijenhorst, L. y van den Broek, P. (2016). Coherence monitoring by good and poor comprehenders in elementary school: Comparing offline and online measures. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 17-23 [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.008].
Horchak, O.V. y Garrido, M. V. (2020). Explicit (not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 583814 [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583814].
Kalyuga, S. (2009). Knowledge elaboration: A cognitive load perspective. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 402-410 [DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.003].
Karlsson J., Jolles D., Koornneef A., van den Broek P. y Van Leijenhorst L. (2019). Individual differences in children’s comprehension of temporal relations: Dissociable contributions of working memory capacity and working memory updating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 185, 1-18 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.007].
Kendeou, P. (2015). Chapter 8. A general inference skill. En E.J. O’Brien, A.E. Cook y R.F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during Reading (pp. 160-181). Cambridge University Press [DOI: 10.1017/9781107279186.009].
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., Helder, A. y Karlsson, J. (2014). A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(1), 10-16 [DOI: 10.1111/ldrp.12025].
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K. y Kusumi, T. (2009). Differences between estimating protagonists’ emotions and evaluating readers’ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 135-151 [DOI: 10.1080/02699930801949116].
Komeda, H. y Kusumi, T. (2006). The effect of a protagonist's emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34(7), 1548-1556 [DOI: 10.3758/BF03195918].
Kraal, A., Koornneef, A.W., Saab, N. y van den Broek, P.W. (2018). Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2017-2040 [DOI: 10.1007/s11145-017-9789-2].
Kraal, A., van den Broek, P.W., Koornneef, A.W., Ganushchak, L.Y. y Saab, N. (2019). Differences in text processing by low- and high-comprehending beginning readers of expository and narrative texts: Evidence from eye movements. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101752 [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101752].
Kühl, T. y Bertrams, A. (2019). Is Learning With Elaborative Interrogation Less Desirable When Learners Are Depleted? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 707 [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00707].
León Santana, I., de Vega Rodríguez, M. y Díaz Gómez, J.M. (1999). Procesamiento del discurso. En F. Cuetos Vega y M. de Vega Rodríguez (Eds.), Psicolingüística del español (pp. 271-289). Madrid: Trotta.
Linderholm, T., Virtue, S., Tzeng, Y. y van den Broek, P. (2004). Fluctuations in the Availability of Information During Reading: Capturing Cognitive Processes Using the Landscape Model. Discourse Processes, 37(2), 165-186 [DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp37025].
McCrudden, M.T., Huynh, L., Lyu, B. y Kulikowich, J.M. (2021). Bridging inferences and learning from multiple complementary texts, Discourse Processes, 58(5-6), 529-548 [DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1924586].
McCrudden, M.T., Magliano, J.P. y Schraw, G. (2011). Relevance in Text Comprehension. En M.T. McCrudden, J.P. Magliano y G. Schraw (Eds.), Text Relevance and Learning from Text (pp. 1-17). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
McCrudden, M.T. y Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and Goal-Focusing in Text Processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113-139 [DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7].
McMaster, K.L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C.A., White, M.J., Rapp, D.N., Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C.M. y Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 100-111 [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017].
Miall, D.S. (1989). Beyond the Schema Given: Affective Comprehension of Literary Narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3(1), 55-78 [DOI: 10.1080/02699938908415236].
Molinari Marotto C., Barreyro J.P., Cevasco J. y van den Broek P. W. (2011). Generation of Emotional Inferences during Text Comprehension: Behavioral Data and Implementation through the Landscape Model. Escritos de Psicología, 4, 9-17 [DOI: 10.24310/espsiescpsi.v4i1.13308].
Mouw, J.M., van Leijenhorst L., Saab N., Danel M.S. y van den Broek, P. (2019). Contributions of emotion understanding to narrative comprehension in children and adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(1), 66-81 [DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2017.1334548].
Mulcahy, M. y Gouldthorp, B. (2016). Positioning the reader: The effect of narrative point-of-view and familiarity of experience on situation model construction. Language and Cognition, 8(1), 96-123 [DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2014.45].
Murray, J.D. (1995). Logical connectives and local coherence. En R.F. Lorch y D.J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 75-94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Navratil, S.D. y Kühl, T. (2019). Learning with elaborative interrogations and the impact of learners' emotional states. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 218-227 [DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12324].
Obergriesser, S. y Stoeger, H. (2020). Students' emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies - How do they affect one another? Learning & Instruction, 66, 101285 [DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101285].
O’Brien, E.J., Shank, D.M., Myers, J.L. y Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 410-420 [DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.410].
Ozgungor, S. y Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Interactions Among Elaborative Interrogation, Knowledge, and Interest in the Process of Constructing Knowledge From Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 437-443 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.437].
Pell, M.D., Jaywant, A., Monetta, L. y Kotz, S.A. (2011). Emotional speech processing: Disentangling the effects of prosody and semantic cues. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 834-853 [DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.516915].
Pispira, J. y Cevasco, J. (2021). El rol de la conectividad causal de los enunciados, la realización de tareas de elaboración toma de notas y la modalidad de presentación en la comprensión de materiales de prevención de la violencia de género. Comunicación presentada en el XIII Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología (23-25 de noviembre). Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Pressley, M., McDaniel, M.A., Turnure, J.E., Wood, E. y Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and Precision of Elaboration: Effects on Intentional and Incidental Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(2), 291-300 [DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.291].
Radvansky, G., Tamplin, A., Armendarez, J. y Thompson, A. (2014). Different Kinds of Causality in Event Cognition. Discourse Processes, 51(7), 601-618 [DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2014.903366].
Ranellucci, J., Hall, N.C. y Goetz, T. (2015). Achievement Goals, Emotions, Learning, and Performance: A Process Model. Motivation Science, 1(2), 98-120 [DOI: 10.1037/mot0000014].
Rocca, M. y Cevasco, J. (2021). Meaningful connections. Literacy Today, mayo-junio, 24-26.
Saux, G. y Cevasco, J. (2019). Decoding digital literacy: developing 21st century skills for today’s learners. Literacy Today, julio-agosto, 10-11.
Schmeichel, B.J., Vohs, K.D. y Baumeister, R.F. (2003). Intellectual Performance and Ego Depletion: Role of the Self in Logical Reasoning and Other Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 33-46 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.33].
Sweller, J., Ayres, P. y Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Springer [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4].
Scrimin, S. y Mason, L. (2015). Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 387-406 [DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12080].
Seipel, B., Carlson, S.E. y Clinton, V.E. (2017). When Do Comprehender Groups Differ? A Moment-by-Moment Analysis of Think-Aloud Protocols of Good and Poor Comprehenders. Reading Psychology, 38(1), 39-70 [DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2016.1216489].
Smith, B.L., Holliday, W.G. y Austin, H.W. (2010). Students’ comprehension of science textbooks using a question-based reading strategy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 363-379 [DOI: 10.1002/TEA.20378].
Sparks, J.R. y Rapp, D.N. (2010). Discourse processing - examining our everyday language experiences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(3), 371-381 [DOI: 10.1002/wcs.11].
Stein, N.L. y Trabasso, T. (1992). The Organization of Emotional Experience: Creating Links among Emotion, Thinking, Language, and Intentional Action. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3-4), 225-244 [DOI: 10.1080/02699939208411070].
Tejada Gómez, L. (2017). Competencia lectora y problemas de conducta: revisión de investigaciones recientes. Apuntes de Psicología, 34(1), 69-74.
Trabasso, T. y van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal Thinking and the Representation of Narrative Events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612-630 [DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X].
Trevors, G., Kendeou, P. y Butterfuss, R. (2017). Emotions Processes in Knowledge Revision. Discourse Processes, 54(5-6), 406-426 [DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1312201].
van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherences. En M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 539- 588). Academic Press.
van den Broek, P. (2010). Using Texts in Science Education: Cognitive Processes and Knowledge Representation. Science, 328, 453-456 [DOI: 10.1126/science.1182594].
van den Broek, P. y Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive Processes in Discourse Comprehension: Passive Processes, Reader-Initiated Processes, and Evolving Mental Representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5-6), 360-372 [DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677].
van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Rapp, D.N., Kendeou, P., Espin, C. y Deno, S. (2006). Connecting cognitive science and educational practice to improve reading comprehension. Poster presentado en la 2006 Research Conference of the Institute of Education Sciences. Washington (15-16 de junio).
van Moort, M.L., Koornneef, A. y van den Broek, P.W. (2021). Differentiating Text-Based and Knowledge-Based Validation Processes during Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 22-41 [DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1727683].
van Peppen L.M., Verkoeijen P.P.J.L., Heijltjes A.E.G., Janssen E.M., Koopmans, D. y van Gog, T. (2018). Effects of Self-Explaining on Learning and Transfer of Critical Thinking Skills. Frontiers in Education, 3, 100 [DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00100].
Wannagat, W., Henkel, M. y Nieding, G. (2020). Children's comprehension of narrative texts: Protagonists’ goals and mental representation of coherence relations. Cognitive Development, 56(5), 100966 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100966].
Weinstein, C.E. y Mayer, R.E. (1983). The teaching of learning strategies. Innovation Abstracts, 5(32), 315-327.
Willoughby, T. y Wood, E. (1994). Elaborative interrogation examined at encoding and retrieval. Learning and Instruction, 4(2), 139-149 [DOI: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90008-6].
Woloshyn, V.E., Paivio, A. y Pressley, M. (1994). Use of elaborative interrogation to help students acquire information consistent with prior knowledge and information inconsistent with prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 79-89 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.79].
Woloshyn, V.E., Pressley, M. y Schneider, W. (1992). Elaborative-interrogation and prior-knowledge effects on learning of facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 115-124 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.115].
Woloshyn, V.E., Willoughby, T., Wood, E. y Pressley, M. (1990). Elaborative interrogation facilitates adult learning of factual paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 513-524 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.513].
Wood, E., Pressley, M. y Winne, P.H. (1990). Elaborative interrogation effects on children's learning of factual content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 741-748 [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.741].
Xiaofeng, M., Xiao-e, Y., Yanru, L. y AiBao, Z. (2016). Prior knowledge level dissociates effects of retrieval practice and elaboration. Learning & Individual Differences, 51, 210-214 [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.012].
Zwaan, R.A. y Rapp, D.N. (2006). Chapter 18. Discourse Comprehension. En M.A. Gernsbacher y M.J. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd Ed. (pp. 725-764). Academic Press [DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369374-7].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joselyn Pispira, Jazmín Cevasco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
