A Preliminary Study on National Identity: Comparing the Piagetian and Vygotskian Perspectives

Authors

  • Josué García Amián Universidad de Sevilla
  • Beatríz Macías Gómez-Estern Universidad de Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55414/9q4wn192

Keywords:

national identity, heterogeneity of verbal thinking, development of social knowledge, narrative way of thinking, mediated action

Abstract

This work's goal is the discussion, in a comparative study, of different ways of approaching the topic of national identity from two theoretical traditions: the Piagetian and the Vygotskian. In order to do so, 48 subjects (ages 7 to 14), of which 32 of whom assisted school regularly and 16 of whom did not, were interviewed following a Piagetian format. The school-attending children were also asked to write a composition about their feelings of belonging. Results obtained lead us to consider the narrative mode of thinking more favourably than logic-scientific reasoning as an adequate basis for subjects' explanations of social relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

.

Downloads

Published

02/11/2001

Issue

Section

Research articles

How to Cite

García Amián, J., & Macías Gómez-Estern, B. (2001). A Preliminary Study on National Identity: Comparing the Piagetian and Vygotskian Perspectives. Apuntes De Psicología, 19(3), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.55414/9q4wn192