Credibility assessment of imagined and perceived recall

Authors

  • Antonio L. Manzanero Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Margarita Diges Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55414/m7hda272

Keywords:

memory, credibility, eyewitness testimony, source monitoring, experimental forensic psychology

Abstract

The characteristics of witnesses' descriptions of'a complex event were varied by manipulating the statement preparation in which they engaged before they "described the events, Descriptions were more likely to be attributed by judges to perception than to imagination if descriptions contained. moderate levels of sensorial and contextual details than if they contained high or low levels of sensorial and contextual details. Also, it seems that preparation affects how people describe complex events ánd that people use some of the same cues to judge the source of other people's memory descriptions as they use in making altributions about the source of their own memories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

.

Downloads

Published

28/10/1994

Issue

Section

Research articles

How to Cite

Manzanero, A. L., & Diges, M. (1994). Credibility assessment of imagined and perceived recall. Apuntes De Psicología, 12(41-42), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.55414/m7hda272